Да, похоже. Вот 1976 год, и звучит, кстати, вполне ЖЖ-созвучно:
Should this country return some of the lands that were seized from the Indians under the guise of a contractual relationship?
As a principle, one should respect the sanctity of a contract among individuals. I'm not certain about contracts among nations; that depends on the nature and behavior of the other nation. But I oppose applying contract law lo American Indians. I discuss this issue in "Collectivized 'Rights'" When a group of people or a nation does not respect individual rights, it cannot claim any rights whatever. The Indians were savages, with ghastly tribal rules and rituals, including the famous "Indian Torture." Such tribes have no rights. Anyone had the right to come here and take whatever they could, because they would be dealing with savages as the Indians dealt with each other-that is, by force. We owe nothing to the Indians, except the memory of monstrous evils done by them. But suppose there is evidence of white people treating Indians badly. That's too bad; I'd regret it. But in the history of this country, it's an exception. It wouldn't give the Indians any kind of rights. Look at their history, look at their culture, look at their treatment of their own people. Those who do not recognize individual rights cannot expect to have any rights, or to have them respected.
The Indians were savages, with ghastly tribal rules and rituals, including the famous "Indian Torture." Such tribes have no rights. Anyone had the right to come here and take whatever they could, because they would be dealing with savages as the Indians dealt with each other-that is, by force.
The Norteamericanos were savages, with ghastly tribal rules and rituals, including the famous "waterboarding" Such tribes have no rights. Anyone had the right to come here and take whatever they could, because they would be dealing with savages as the Norteamericanos dealt with each other-that is, by force.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Should this country return some of the lands that were seized from the Indians under the guise of a contractual relationship?
As a principle, one should respect the sanctity of a contract among individuals. I'm not certain about contracts among nations; that depends on the nature and behavior of the other nation. But I oppose applying contract law lo American Indians. I discuss this issue in "Collectivized 'Rights'" When a group of people or a nation does not respect individual rights, it cannot claim any rights whatever. The Indians were savages, with ghastly tribal rules and rituals, including the famous "Indian Torture." Such tribes have no rights. Anyone had the right to come here and take whatever they could, because they would be dealing with savages as the Indians dealt with each other-that is, by force. We owe nothing to the Indians, except the memory of monstrous evils done by them. But suppose there is evidence of white people treating Indians badly. That's too bad; I'd regret it. But in the history of this country, it's an exception. It wouldn't give the Indians any kind of rights. Look at their history, look at their culture, look at their treatment of their own people. Those who do not recognize individual rights cannot expect to have any rights, or to have them respected.
no subject
The Norteamericanos were savages, with ghastly tribal rules and rituals, including the famous "waterboarding" Such tribes have no rights. Anyone had the right to come here and take whatever they could, because they would be dealing with savages as the Norteamericanos dealt with each other-that is, by force.
no subject
no subject
(C уважением)
За это Вас пригвоздят к столбу многие: от неосоветских охранителей до либертарианцев.