![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Ротбард. Типа эссе о неравенстве человеческих рас
Essays of Murray N. Rothbard
Edited by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
RACE! THAT MURRAY BOOK
December 1994
Этот тяжелый бреддушевнобольного отца современного либертарианства цитировать невозможно - там каждый кусок липкой грязи равно ценен, так что читайте подряд. Ну... в качестве десерта (курсив авторский, если чё):
The political situation of the 1930s and 40s was used to cunning effect by the egalitarian left to stamp out all opposition. Any expression of racial home truths was automatically lambasted as "fascist," "Nazi," and therefore ultra-rightist. In fact, all of this was a fabrication. The leading "racial scientists" from the 1890s until the 1930s were in agreement across the ideological and political spectrum. In fact, most of the leading racial scientists were Progressives, left-liberals, and New Dealers. In that period, only Communists and other Marxists were egalitarians, for ideological reasons. But the Commies were able to use their extensive ideological and propaganda machine during that era to somehow link Nazi persecution of Jews to racism, and with doctrines of racial superiority and inferiority. In that way, the Commies were able to bully or convert all manner of liberals and leftists, including those ex-Trotskyites and liberals who would much later become neoconservatives. This left the conservatives, who were the least amenable to Marxist influence, but who in turn were bullied into submission by being smeared savagely as "Hitlerite" for any expression of racialist views.
In point of fact, however, it should be clear that Hitler and the Nazis did not persecute Jews because they believed Jews to be inferior in intelligence. And as for blacks, there were too few blacks residing in Europe for the Nazis to bother about, much less persecute.
via![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ok_its_the_last, в этой дискуссии.
Слов не осталось, даже матерных.
Edited by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
RACE! THAT MURRAY BOOK
December 1994
Этот тяжелый бред
The political situation of the 1930s and 40s was used to cunning effect by the egalitarian left to stamp out all opposition. Any expression of racial home truths was automatically lambasted as "fascist," "Nazi," and therefore ultra-rightist. In fact, all of this was a fabrication. The leading "racial scientists" from the 1890s until the 1930s were in agreement across the ideological and political spectrum. In fact, most of the leading racial scientists were Progressives, left-liberals, and New Dealers. In that period, only Communists and other Marxists were egalitarians, for ideological reasons. But the Commies were able to use their extensive ideological and propaganda machine during that era to somehow link Nazi persecution of Jews to racism, and with doctrines of racial superiority and inferiority. In that way, the Commies were able to bully or convert all manner of liberals and leftists, including those ex-Trotskyites and liberals who would much later become neoconservatives. This left the conservatives, who were the least amenable to Marxist influence, but who in turn were bullied into submission by being smeared savagely as "Hitlerite" for any expression of racialist views.
In point of fact, however, it should be clear that Hitler and the Nazis did not persecute Jews because they believed Jews to be inferior in intelligence. And as for blacks, there were too few blacks residing in Europe for the Nazis to bother about, much less persecute.
via
ok_its_the_last, в этой дискуссии.Слов не осталось, даже матерных.
no subject
no subject
But the Commies were able to use their extensive ideological and propaganda machine during that era to somehow link Nazi persecution of Jews to racism
Вроде бы автор тут утверждает (имплицитно), что нацистская идеология не была расистской. Что, честно говоря, тоже весьма удивительно.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Рассуждение довольно идиотское, это да. Но преследования евреев не отрицает.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ведь очевидно, что для общего содержания статьи она совершенно побочна. Более того, верен даже общий смысл этого ошибочно сформулированного тезиса Ротбарда. Конечно, евреев уничтожали по расовому признаку, даже если на практике он аппроксимировался религиозной принадлежностью их дедушек и бабушек (в СССР - очевидно, записью в паспорте). Но существенно здесь то, что несколько пропагандистских течений, в том числе советская пропаганда, совместными усилиями успешно отождествили признание возможности популяционных (расовых) детерминант человеческого поведения (наряду со многими прочими детерминантами) - с гитлеровским геноцидом и с авторитарным политическим устройством вообще (для маскировки называемом "фашизмом").
При этом главный тезис статьи Ротбарда совсем другой, и изложен, естественно, не в начале статьи, а ближе к концу (естественно, с учетом того, что слово "либерал" в контексте американской публицистики имеет значение, противоположное тому, что оно имеет в русском языке):
But, when all is said and done, the truth about race and IQ means a lot more to liberals and to neocons than it does to paleos. For the liberals and neocons, being statist to the core, are obliged to seize control of resources and to allocate them somehow among the various groups of the population. Liberals-neocons are "sorters," they aim to sort people out, to subsidize here, to control and restrict there. So, to the neocon or liberal power elite, ethnic or racial science is a big thing because it tells these sorters who exactly they should subsidize, who they should control, who they should restrict and limit. Should they use taxpayer funds to subsidize the "disadvantaged" or geniuses? Which is more socially productive, which dysgenic? <...>
But while neocons and liberals want the planners and national statists to sort, subsidize, and control, for which they need scientific data such as intelligence as guides, paleos are very different. Paleos believe in Liberty; paleos believe in the rights of person and property; paleos want no government subsidizers or controllers. Paleos want Big Government off all of our backs, be we smart or dumb, black, brown or white.
И хотя я много раз говорил, что многое из того, что написал плодовитый Ротбард, мне кажется неверным, в данном случае он ухватывает правильную мысль. Страх перед "вредными" идеями о расовой проблематике, пронизывающий всю американскую политическую жизнь, проистекает из непримиримого противоречия двух факторов: во-первых, американцы и так прекрасно знают все то, что Мюррей и прочие пытались доказать умной статистикой; во-вторых, этатисты понимают, что если это знание транслировать в любезную им государственную политику эгалитаристского контроля и перераспределения, результаты будут откровенно возмутительными и неприемлемыми. Но вместо того, чтобы отказаться от эгалитаризма, они отказываются от знания.
Другое дело, что Ротбард ошибся в своих прогнозах. 1994 год не стал ни революционным, не переломным. Книга Мюррея не смогла переломить общий тренд.
no subject