Еще один мракобесный список

[taki_net]

В продолжение темы - по наводке bdag_med список, составленный как бы учеными либертарианских и правых убеждений: http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf

Дальше - текст, извлеченный из PDF.

THE INTERCOLLEGIATE REVIEW—Fall 1999

The Fifty Worst (and Best)
Books of the Century

The turn of the century is a time to take stock of the path we have followed, the
better to discern where we ought to be going. Historical discernment requires coming to
judgment about what has been noble, good, and beneficial in our time—but also about what has been base, bad, and harmful. In the life of the mind, what has our century produced that deserves admiration? What has it produced that deserves only contempt?

Earlier this year, the Modern Library published a list styled The Hundred Best
Nonfiction Books of the Twentieth Century. A list of significant books can make a compel-
ling statement about how we are to understand an age. In judging the quality of a book,
one necessarily judges the perception and the profundity which the book displays, as well as
the character of the book’s influence.

Yet many were dissatisfied with the several “Best” lists published in the past year, finding them biased, too contemporary, or simply careless. So the Intercollegiate Review (IR) set out to assemble its own critically serious roster of the Best—and the Worst— Books of the Century. To assist us in this task, we relied on the advice of a group of exceptional academics from a variety of disciplines.

To make the task more manageable, our lists include only nonfiction books originally
published in English, and so certain giants of the century such as Alexander Solzhenitsyn
will not be found here, on two counts. We left the definition of “Best” up to our consultants,
but we defined “Worst” for them as books which were widely celebrated in their day but
which upon reflection can be seen as foolish, wrong-headed, or even pernicious.

There was broad agreement about a majority of titles, but there were also fierce
disagreements. Several titles appeared on both “Best” and “Worst” lists. We have tried to be
faithful to the contributions of our consultants, but the responsibility for final composition of the list lay with the editors of the IR.

What, then, do these lists reveal about the character of the Twentieth Century?

Our “Worst” list reveals a remarkable number of volumes of sham social science of
every kind. The attempt to understand human action as an epiphenomenon of “hidden”
and purportedly “deeper” motives such as sex, economics, or the Laws of History is a power-
ful yet hardly salutary trend in our century. The presumed “breakthrough” insight that
professes to reveal the shape of some inevitable future has time and again proven to be
profoundly misguided. And with human life reduced in these theories to a matter for
technological manipulation, our century also reveals a persistent attraction to a dehuman-
izing statist administration of society.

Prominent on the “Best” list, on the other hand, are many volumes of extraordinary reflection and creativity in a traditional form, which heartens us with the knowledge
that fine writing and clear-mindedness are perennially possible.

Editors: Mark C. Henrie, Winfield J.C. Myers, Jeffrey O. Nelson. Consultants: Brian Domitrovic, Harvard University; Victor Davis Hanson, California State University, Fresno; E. Christian Kopff, University of Colorado; Peter Augustine Lawler, Berry College; Leonard Liggio, Atlas Educational Foundation; Mark M. Malvasi, Randolph-Macon College; Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr., Harvard University; Wilfred McClay, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga; Mark Molesky, Harvard University; George H. Nash, author; George Panichas, Modern Age; John Willson, Hillsdale College.

THE VERY WORST ...

1. Margaret Mead, Coming of Age in Samoa (1928)
So amusing did the natives find the white woman’s prurient questions that
they told her the wildest tales—and she believed them! Mead misled a
generation into believing that the fantasies of sexual progressives were an
historical reality on an island far, far away.

2. Beatrice & Sidney Webb, Soviet Communism: A New Civilization? (1935)
An idea whose time has come...and gone, thank God.

3. Alfred Kinsey, et.al., Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948)
So mesmerized were Americans by the authority of Science, with a capital S,
that it took forty years for anyone to wonder how data is gathered on the
sexual responses of children as young as five. A pervert’s attempt to demon-
strate that perversion is “statistically” normal.

4. Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (1964)
Dumbed-down Heidegger and a seeming praise of kinkiness became the
Bible of the sixties and early postmodernism.

5. John Dewey, Democracy and Education (1916)
Dewey convinced a generation of intellectuals that education isn’t about
anything; it’s just a method, a process for producing democrats and scien-
tists who would lead us into a future that “works.” Democracy and Science
(both pure means) were thereby transformed into the moral ends of our
century, and America’s well-meaning but corrupting educationist establish-
ment was born.


... AND THE REST OF THE WORST

Theodor W. Adorno, et.al., The Authoritarian Personality (1950)
Don’t want to be bothered to engage the arguments of your conservative political
opponents? Just demonstrate “scientifically” that all their political beliefs are the
result of a psychological disorder.

Charles Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (1935)
Beard reduces support for the U.S. Constitution to a conspiracy among the
Founding Fathers to protect their economic interests. Forrest McDonald’s We The
People provides the corrective.

Martin Bernal, Black Athena (1987)
All of Western philosophical and scientific thought was stolen from Africa and a
conspiracy ensued to conceal the theft for more than three millenia. Provocative,
but where’s the evidence?

Boston Women’s Health Book Collective, Our Bodies, Our Selves (1976)
Or, Our Bodies, Our Liberal Selves. A textbook example of the modern impulse to
elevate the body and its urges, libidinal and otherwise, above soul and spirit.

Noam Chomsky & Edward S. Herman, After the Cataclysm (1979)
Chomsky’s anti-anti-communism was so intense that he was driven to deny the
genocide perpetrated by Cambodian communists—stipulating of course that even if
the charges against the Khmer Rouge were true, massacres were at least understand-
able, perhaps even justified.

Eldridge Cleaver, Soul On Ice (1968)
A rapist and murderer whose denunciation of The Man brought him the admira-
tion of guilt-stricken white liberals.

Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb (1968)
What this scientist proclaimed as an inevitable “fact”—that “hundreds of millions of
people are going to starve to death” in the 1970s—turned out entirely “evitable.”

Harvey Cox, The Secular City (1965)
Celebrated the liberation that accompanied modern urban life at the precise
moment when such liberation came to mean the freedom to be mugged, raped, and
murdered. Argued that “death of god” theology was the inevitable and permanent
future for modern man just before the contemporary boom in “spirituality.”

Herbert Croly, The Promise of American Life (1919)
A pernicious book that celebrates the growth of the welfare state and champions
the unlikely prospect of “achieving Jeffersonian ends through Hamiltonian means.”

Havelock Ellis, Studies in the Psychology of Sex (1936)
Everything you always wanted to know about sex, but were afraid to ask—and
rightly so. The first influential book to take a wholly clinical view of human sexuality
divorced from values, morals, and emotions.

Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally (1989)
Fish likes to ask his predecessors and critics, “How stupid can you be?” Well...

John Kenneth Galbraith, The Affluent Society (1958)
Made Americans dissatisfied with the ineradicable fact of poverty. Led to foolish
public policies that produced the hell that was the 1960s.

Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation (1966-69)
Writing glib, cliché-ridden verbiage about the virtues of irreligion, Gay matches the
sophistry of the dimmest lumières.

Lillian Hellman, Scoundrel Time (1976)
The self-absorbed, unrepentant, and generously fabricated memoir of an American
Stalinist.

Alger Hiss, Recollections of a Life (1988)
Hiss draws attention to his essential mediocrity in this sad tale of a life led largely to
conceal a lie, a lie in which thousands felt compelled to participate.

Aldous Huxley, The Doors of Perception (1954)
Huxley paved the way to the ruin of countless lives by writing up his experience with
mescaline as a sort of primordial homecoming and lending his all-too considerable
prestige to the claimed benefits of hallucinogenic drugs.

Philip Johnson & Henry Russell Hitchcock, The International Style (1966)
Build ugly buildings, wear funny glasses, make lots of money, and justify it all by
writing a book.

John F. Kennedy, Profiles in Courage (1956)
Should have been called, Profiles in Ghost-Writing.

John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936)
This book did for Big Government what Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring did for the
tse-tse fly.

Timothy Leary, The Politics of Ecstasy (1968)
Leary always said it was a mistake to take things too seriously. This book proves he
was right at least once in his life.

Norman Mailer, Armies of the Night (1968)
Fact or fiction? Not even Mailer knew for sure.

Catharine MacKinnon, Only Words (1993)
“Sticks and stones can break my bones but names will never hurt me.” Not accord-
ing to Catharine MacKinnon. This book provides the foundation for some of the
most ridiculous developments in recent American law.

Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels (1979)
Bored with the real Gospels and real Christianity, professors of religion were thrilled
to find out how important—not to mention feminist and pre-Socratic—these
fragments were.

Simon N. Patten, The New Basis of Civilization (1907)
This favorite of East Coast busybodies gave crucial middlebrow intellectual support
to the proposition of an income tax. Called for a general willingness among
Americans “to bestow without conditions and to be taxed for public and far-
reaching ends.” Thanks a lot, Simon Patten.

The Pentagon Papers as Published by the New York Times,
Based on Investigative Reporting by Neil Sheehan (1971)
Publicizing the blunderings of “the Best and the Brightest” did nothing but under-
mine the new President’s—Nixon’s—statesmanlike efforts to salvage the mess in
Vietnam bequeathed to him by JFK and LBJ.

Karl Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies (1950)
Popper “shows” that he is smarter and more open-minded than Plato or Hegel.
That kind of thinking is one of the main obstacles to open-mindedness in our time.

Walter Rauschenbusch, Christianity and the Social Crisis (1907)
“[The Church] should therefore strengthen the existing communistic institutions
and aid the evolution of society from the present temporary stage of individualism
to a higher form of communism.” Eek!

John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971)
The hollow soul of liberalism elaborated with a technical apparatus that would
have made a medieval Schoolman blush.

John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World (1919)
… and after that, Reed went home and the Bolsheviks struck the set.

Charles Reich, The Greening of America (1970)
Out of blue jeans, marijuana, free love, and the monumental egoism of a genera-
tion that refused to grow up, a Yale Law School professor concocted an adolescent
fantasy: Consciousness III. Groovy, man.

Wilhelm Reich, The Function of the Orgasm (1942)
The notion that sitting in one of Reich’s orgone boxes would lead both to a happy
individual and to a healthy and free society was only one indication of Reich’s
absurdity. If only the real thing had worked as well as Woody Allen’s orgasmatron.

Carl Rogers, On Becoming a Person (1961)
Rogers disconnected human feelings from nature, disconnected the human and the
spiritual from both real religion and the rigor of science, and ruined countless
Roman Catholic religious orders in the process. Made B.F. Skinner look good.

Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979)
The best, and therefore worst, exposition of American philosophical pragmatism.
Had devastating effects on the study not only of philosophy but also of literature.

Jerry Rubin, Do It! (1970)
The Bible of the lazy and the crazy.

Bertrand Russell, Why I am Not A Christian (1936)
Known to be harmful to your spiritual health.

Margaret Sanger, Woman and the New Race (1920)
This founder of Planned Parenthood published Adolph Hitler’s eugenics guru in
her magazine in the early 1930s. That Women and the New Race sprang from Sanger
is no surprise.

Jonathan Schell, The Fate of the Earth (1982)
Amidst much amateur philosophical rumination, Schell proposed a syllogism:
Nuclear war necessarily means the extinction of the human race. No human value
(such as political liberty) can justify such an act. Therefore, unilateral disarmament
is morally mandatory. Meanwhile, Ronald Reagan’s vigorous confrontation with
the Soviets ended the Cold War and saved us from the fear of Armageddon.

Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., The Age of Jackson (1945)
Whig History sees past ages striving bravely to become...us. In Schlesinger’s
Boddhisatva history, every age has a liberal Enlightened One who comes to battle
the conservatives.

B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity (1971)
Swallowing whole the superstitions of modern scientism, this psychologist was
convinced that the human psyche was nothing but a superstition.

Susan Sontag, Against Interpretation (1966)
Don’t think. Just feel.

E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (1964)
The book that ruined social history. In over 800 pages, Thompson recasts the story
of English working folk into a simplistic Marxist romance. This would become the
cookie cutter for a generation’s worth of bland dissertations and predictable
monographs.

Paul Tillich, The Courage to Be (1952)
Believing in modern meaninglessness more than in “the God of theism,” this
theologian preached Courage (self-assertion “in spite of”) rather than Faith. But
would the Romans have even bothered to throw him to the lions?

H. G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy (1928)
Wells emerges as the comically earnest would-be John the Baptist for a new religion
of temporal salvation to be ushered in by a vanguard embracing “the supreme duty
of subordinating the personal life to the creation of a world directorate.” Oh, my.

Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
According to H.L. Mencken, a book for “the tender-minded in general.” He
staggered to behold “the whole Wilsonian buncombe...its ideational hollowness, its
ludicrous strutting and bombast, its heavy dependence on greasy and meaningless
words, its frequent descents into mere sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

Malcolm X (with the assistance of Alex Haley), The Autobiography of Malcolm X (1965)
“By any means necessary”? No, violence was not, and is not, the answer.

Список душечек и кисочек - в следующем постинге.

Comments

[frau-derrida.livejournal.com]

"приложили специальные усилия"
а какие?

[taki-net.livejournal.com]

Я не очень понимаю Ваш вопрос. Из идеологии что Хайека, что Фридмана, вообще говоря, имплицитно следует свобода сексуальных девиаций, но явно они это не проговаривают. А вот свобода расовой дискриминации тоже следует, и они ее проговаривают (по крайней мере Фридман). Может, это так случайно вышло, что одни непопулярные выводы граждане не забыли озвучить, а другие - забыли.

[frau-derrida.livejournal.com]

никакого подвоха в вопросе не было
я спросила о том, чего не знала
спасибо за ответ

[taki-net.livejournal.com]

Пожалуйста, извините за тон, всегда рад.

[frau-derrida.livejournal.com]

:)